Numi absorber radioactive water system

(PART II)

ABSTRACT

The goal of this project is to size up the pumps and other components needed for the absorber radioactive water system.  The purpose of this report is to describe the steps taken in the selection of the different components of this water system.

 

INTRODUCTION

The Neutrinos at the Main Injector Project will construct the entire infrastructure required to produce a neutrino beam, which will be used to perform physics experiments.  The final stage in the production of the neutrino beam takes place in the absorber.  The beam absorber absorbs protons that did not interact in the target, mesons that have not decayed and hadrons.

The core of the beam absorber consists of a series of water-cooled aluminum plates.  The heat load on these plates is considerable, ~70 kW at nominal design conditions, since the particles filtered by it have high energies.  It is crucial to avoid overheating the plates because costly and time-consuming replacements would have to be made.  Therefore, a water-cooling system had to be designed to maintain the absorber plates at an operational temperature. 

Given that the system diagram was already designed, this project had the purpose of sizing components of the system, all of which required engineering calculations.  Other calculations on the system’s behavior were also made.

SECTIONS OF THE REPORT

     This report has been divided into several sections.

1.      Diagram of the system

2.      Required flow rate

3.      Pressure drops

§       Pipes

§       Miter bends, elbows, and Tees

§       Pressure drop and flow rates for the absorber plates

§       Summary

4.      Pump selection

5.      Expansion tank

6.      Heat exchanger

Back to index


SYSTEM DIAGRAM

The drawings shown below are a rough sketch of the much more detailed NuMI Absorber Raw (Radio Active Water) System (drawing number 8875.117-MD-363032).  Only the most important components of the system are shown.  Additionally, the drawings show some of the assumptions made on the length of the pipe and the quantity of elbows and T’s.  Please note that the left-side diagram is called primary subsystem and right-side diagram is called secondary subsystem throughout this report.   Both systems intersect at the heat exchanger, which is marked with a red dashed rectangle.

All pipe lengths were estimated from the tunnel layouts.  All piping is 3”, schedule 10 for the primary subsystem and schedule 40 for the secondary subsystem.  However, the second subsystem could also use schedule 10 piping.  Stainless steel pipes will be used, since it does not cause aluminum to corrode.  The water in the primary subsystem will be filtered from ions but it will become radioactivated due to the beam.


Figure 1.  Basic schematic of the system and its two subsystems.

Back to index

Back to top


REQUIRED FLOW RATE FOR THE SYSTEM

      To find the pressure drop across the different parts of the system, it is necessary to first calculate what is the required flow rate of water.  Across the “de-ionizing bottle” a flow of 10 gpm (gallons per minute) is required.  The required flow rate across the absorber is not known.  However, other physicists performed MARS simulations and estimated the rate of heat going into the absorber to be 70 kW.  Assuming all the heat is absorbed by the water and that the water temperature increase will be from 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit, the rate of mass transfer across the absorber can be calculated using the following equation:

qin = md C (T2 – T1 )

Where

qin à Rate of heat transfer

md à Rate of mass transfer

C à Heat capacity

(T2 – T1 ) à Final minus initial water temperatures

The rate of mass transfer can be converted into volumetric flow rate with the following formula.

Vd = m v

Where

Vd à Volumetric flow rate

v à Specific volume

 

      For the primary subsystem, the volumetric flow rate was 48.136gpm, which was rounded up to 50 gpm.  Therefore, adding 10 gpm of flow required across the de-ionizing bottle, the required flow across the pumps is 60 gpm.  The flow rate for the secondary subsystem was considered to be the same.

Back to index

Back to top


PRESSURE DROPs

PIPES

      The most conservative way of performing this calculation is by assuming that the flow through all the pipes in the system is 60 gpm.  Detailed calculations, however, were performed to find the pressure drops per pipe unit length according to the flow in each pipe.  The procedure to obtain this is the same.

Using the following two equations with the proper units, the Reynolds number is obtained.

Re = D Vel p / u

Vel = (V/dt) / A

Where

Re à Reynold’s number

D à Internal pipe diameter

Vel à Fluid velocity

p à Fluid density

u à Absolute viscosity

(V/dt) à Volumetric flow rate

A à Internal pipe area

 

Once the proper Reynolds number is obtained the pressure drop can be computed from the following formulas:

The S. E. Haaland approximation to the Colebrook equation

f = (-1.8 Log(6.9/Re + (E/(3.7 D))^1.11))^-2

Where

f  à Friction factor

Re à Reynolds number

Eà Roughness of the material

D à Diameter

HL = f L/D Vel^2/2g

 P = p g HL

Where

HL à Head loss

f  à Friction factor

L à Length of pipe

D à Pipe diameter

Vel à Fluid velocity

g à Acceleration of gravity

p à Density

P à Pressure drop

 

      Regardless of the complexity of these calculations, the pressure drop for the whole piping network of the primary subsystem resulted to be less than 1 psi (pounds per square inch).  For the secondary subsystem a more significant 6 psi pressure drop in piping was computed.

 

MITER BENDS, ELBOWS AND TEES

        The primary and secondary subsystems were estimated to have 20 elbows and 4 tees each.  The head losses for these elements were calculated from the following formula.

HL = K Vel^2 / (2 g)

Where

Vel à Fluid velocity

G à  Acceleration of gravity

K = 60f  à 90 degrees miter bends and flow thru branch in Tees

K = 30f  à standard elbows

      The resulting pressure drop from these elements is equal to 0.5 psig.  Miter bends are not used in piping but they are used inside the absorber channels.


PRESSURE DROP AND FLOW RATES FOR THE ABSORBER PLATES

      The NuMI absorber consists of a series of aluminum and steel plates.  The purpose of the absorber is to remove particles other than neutrinos from the beam, that is protons that did not interact in the target, mesons that have not decayed and hadrons.  The aluminum plates receive most of the heat load since the beam passes through them first.  The steel plates filter all the remaining particles and do not receive a considerable heat load.  As stated previously, the heat transfer rate on the aluminum plates is 70 kW and the flow rate for the absorber as a whole is 50 gpm.  An illustration of the absorber and two of the aluminum plates can be observed in figures 2, 3, and 4.  Please note the differences between the two plates.

 

Figure 2.  Absorber.

 

 

 

 

                                                             

 

Figure 3.  First of the water-cooled absorber’s aluminum plates.

Figure 4.  Third of the water-cooled absorber’s aluminum plates.

      The channels in the absorber run in parallel.  The flow in the inlet divides into sixteen 0.76” aluminum pipes.  The flow in the outlet pipes (16) converges into one.  Moreover, the channel configuration varies for the different plates, same as the length of the aluminum pipe.  Since the channels in the plates are in parallel, the pressure drop for all of them must be the same.  It would be conservative to calculate this pressure drop by just dividing the 50 gpm flow by 16 and then computing the pressure drop across one channel.  Nevertheless, a much more detailed calculation was performed for the double purpose of computing the exact pressure drop and the volumetric flow rate of water through each plate.  This is useful to corroborate the proper thermal performance of the absorber.

      The channels inside the absorber were considered to have a roughness slightly greater than commercial steel, while the aluminum pipe was considered to have a roughness equal to that of commercial steel.  The “elbows” (were flow changes direction) inside the plates were considered 90 degree miter bends.  The inlet and outlet manifolds were considered a succession of Tees.

      Appendix V shows in detail the formulas that were combined to derive the equations used to calculate the flow rates through each plate.  If the appendix takes a long time to load, try saving the file into your hard drive and then open it with Adobe Acrobat.  The solutions to the equations obtained in appendix V were found with Excel.  The spreadsheet solutions are available in appendix VI.

     The volumetric flow rates for each of the plates vary from 5.8 to 7 gallons per minute.  This variation is not something that may seriously disrupt the absorber’s performance.  The pressure drop across the absorber plus the pressure drop at the manifolds (the device needed to divide the flow) is equal to 1.12 psi.  The manifolds do not add any considerable pressure drop.  Therefore, the pumps must be sized up according to the other branch of the primary subsystem (the de-ionizing bottle branch) where the pressure drop is greater.  Additionally, the pressure-regulating valve should be located on the branch that leads to the absorber and not on the branch that leads to the de-ionizing bottle [the NuMI Absorber Raw System drawing shows this valve in the wrong place].

 

SUMMARY

      The following table summarizes the pressure drops for the different components of the two subsystems.  An asterisk indicates that the pressure drop has been reasonably assumed.

Component

Primary subsystem

Secondary subsystem

Absorber plates, manifold, piping and elbows (the whole absorber branch) Not considered for pump

 

Less than 2 psig

 

N/a

De-ionizing bottle

15 psig

N/a

Pipe (in 20 ft, not considering absorber branch in primary subsystem)

 

0.05 psig

 

6.02 psig

Elbows and tees (Primary subsystem 10 and 4, secondary subsystem 20 and 3)

 

0.36 psig

 

0.5 psig

Full Flow Filter

5 psig*

5 psig*

Heat Exchangers

5 psig*

5 psig* X 2

Strainers

2 ½” strainer, max spheres 3/32” from Hellan Strainer Catalog page 43

 

1 psig

 

1 psig

3 Way valve

N/a

5 psig*

TOTALS PRESSURE DROP

26.41 psig

27.52 psig

TOTAL HEAD LOSS

Press Drop/((density)(gravity))

 

~61.5 feet

 

~64 feet

 

Back to index

Back to top


PUMP SELECTION

      The head and flow requirements for the two pumps are almost the same: 60 gpm @ 42-44 FT.  Therefore the same pump may be chosen for the two subsystems.  A pump that operates at 1750 or less revolutions per minute would be preferred to reduce noise.  However, pumps that operate at that speed have poor efficiencies at the specified flow and head.  Therefore, the following 3500 RPM closed coupled pump was chosen as the most suitable candidate [see graph below].


 


Figure 5.  Graph of the 5”-1 ¼” pump series.

      The pump shown above is relatively inexpensive.  Also, it can be ordered in “all iron”, since this material avoids copper bearing materials.  Copper bearing materials should not be used in a system with aluminum components.  The most important technical data of this pump is that it gives the required head at the required flow rate.  The 4 9/16” impeller (second curve from top to bottom) can be used to have a little extra flow through each of the system’s parts.  However, this same impeller can be trimmed down to 4 ½” to give an output closer to the exact requirements of the system.  In both cases a motor of 2 horsepower (or higher) that operates at 3500 rpm is required.

 

NET POSITIVE SUCTION HEAD

        In order to function properly, all centrifugal pumps require a certain absolute pressure on their suction side.  This is called “net positive suction head required” (NPSH required).  The system, however, can give a certain amount of NPSH; this term is called NPSH available.  In theory the NPSHavailable has to be more than or equal to NPSHrequired.  In practice it is better to apply a safety margin.  Therefore,  (1.5)NPSHavailable has to be more than or equal to NPSHrequired.

(1.5) NPSHavailable > or = NPSHrequired

     From the graph NPSHrequired= 8 ft.  From Burks Pumps Catalog section 11 page 11 the following equation is obtained:

NPSHavailable = (Barometric pressure (min - psia) + Gauge pressure (pressure in expansion tank - psig) –Vapor Pressure (max)*(2.31/ specific gravity) + static head – pipe loss

      The last two terms from the last equation are negligible, thus they are ignored.  All the other terms in the equation above can be obtained from books, with the exception of gauge pressure.  Gauge Pressure is the pressure at which the expansion tank will be set.  Solving the equality and the equality above for water temperatures of 150 and 200 degrees Fahrenheit give a Gauge Pressure of –4 and 3.5 psig respectively.  Temperatures as high as 200 are not expected, therefore the system could even operate at a vacuum pressure!  This is not good for the pumps, since any leaks in the system could make air come inside the pipes and into the pumps, which reduces pump life and efficiency.  Therefore, the recommended pressure for the expansion tank is 10 psig.

Back to index

Back to top


EXPANSION TANK

        The expansion tank is a pressure vessel that is required to stabilize the system by providing an “air cushion” for water expansion.  It also maintains the pumps operating at a safe pressure.  As previously stated, the recommended pressure for the expansion tank is 10 psig.  However, ventilation of the tank is necessary to avoid flammable concentrations of hydrogen, which may be created during the absorber operation.  As a consequence, the inlet valve of the pressure vessel would be set at 12 psig and the outlet pressure would be 8 psig.  These settings are more than enough to ensure proper ventilation and pressure.

      The capacity of the expansion tank is determined by equating 10% of the expansion tank’s volume with the expected liquid expansion.  The liquid expansion is computed from the volume of water in the system (pipes, heat exchanger, full flow filter, etc) and the expected temperature fluctuation.  The following formulas were used for this calculation:

V = L A + other elements(water in heat exchanger, full flow filter, de-ionizing bottle, and absorber)

m@60 F = m@140 F

m =V/v

Where

Và Volume

Là length of pipe

Aà Cross sectional area of the pipe

mà Mass

Và Volume

và Specific volume

      By using these formulas the expected expansion of the primary subsystem is calculated to be 4.94 gallons.  Therefore, the expansion tank’s capacity of the primary subsystem should be 50 gallons.  The expected water expansion of the secondary subsystem is equal to 6.84 gallons.  The expansion tank from the secondary system should be at least 70 gallons in capacity.

      Another important component of the expansion tank is the pressure relief valve.  The tank design pressure will be 100 psig.  The relief valve should open at any pressure in the range of 20 to 70 psig.  However the flow capacity of it is determined with the following equation.

Qa = 0.029  Wc

Where

Qa à Flow capacity in cubic feet per minute of free air

Wc à Water capacity of the container in pounds

      The water capacity in pounds of the pressure vessel can be obtained from its volume and the formulas shown before.  Using the proper units, the required flow capacity of the relief valve is equal to 12.1 cubic feet per minute.

Back to index

Back to top


HEAT EXCHANGER

      The two heat exchangers of the system are expected to exchange 70 kW but 200 kW will be used for the specification to allow some safety margin.  The heat exchanger that links the two systems will be a plate and frame heat exchanger.  Plate and frame heat exchangers exchange heat more effectively, but they can only be used with clean fluids.   The heat exchanger in the secondary subsystem will be a shell and tube heat exchanger.  It is not as effective as the other, but it can handle fluids such as pond water easily.  The specifications for the plate-and-frame and shell-and-tube heat exchangers are shown in appendix VII and appendix VIII respectively.

Back to index

Back to top